"Dear Mr. Timothy D. “Tim” Cook and Mr. Peter Oppenheimer,
Please take notice of the attached Adobe PDF document regarding Executive of Apple, Inc. and massive liabilities they may be hiding from Shareholders, Auditors, Bond Holders, Insurance Companies and even criminal authorities.
I have offered both your corporate counsel Mr. Durward Bruce Sewell, General Counsel for Apple and Steve Dowling, Senior Director Corporate Public Relations at Apple and employees that report to you directly of these liabilities giving them time to respond to the issues presented before SEC and other Federal and State criminal and civil actions are taken against Apple and it’s Executives involved.
I granted Apple time to respond through the attached communique and both Mssrs. Sewell and Dowling fail to acknowledge in any way, including refusing to return calls and faxes and where both of them should have sought outside counsel due to the conflicts they have directly with the allegations being levied to contact me regarding these liabilities that are in the billions to Apple.
I note that Mr. Sewell may have been implicated in insider trading recently and believe that these matters may have also been insider matters that if exposed could have massive implications on personal stock holdings of Apple executives involved.
In the odd chance that you are not aware of me, Eliot Ivan Bernstein and the Iviewit inventions that have been cited as “holy grail” in the digital imaging and video world (and used throughout the Apple product lines) and you are also unaware of these past liability matters and the past deadline for response, I will therefore grant you a time period of one week to respond to this email from today (and fax copy will also be sent) before we must take next step actions that a failure to communicate will impart both civilly and criminally for all those involved at Apple.
If you have not responded by that time, please take this as notice of your liabilities set forth in the attached PDF document “20121109 Steve Dowling Apple Inc Letter re Bruce Sewell FINAL SIGNED.pdf” and the correspondences attached below and promptly notify all parties that may have liabilities from these matters, including the Board of Directors, Auditors, Insurance Carriers, etc.
Best Regards and my sincere hope that we can work these matters out in a professional business manner, if you would like to take that approach my Iphone is on.
Eliot"
Open Letter to APPLE Executives Timothy D. “Tim” Cook and Peter Oppenheimer regarding APPLE General Counsel Bruce Sewell and Steve Dowling, From iViewit Technology Eliot Bernstein
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Randazza Legal Group, Porn Industry Attorney Marc Randazza on the Wrong Side of the Law, Free Speech and the First Amendment Rights of All.
"
Marc Randazza on the WRONG Side of Free Speech and the First Amendment AGAIN.
Marc Randazza of Corbin Fisher, Marc Randazza - Randazza Legal Group has serious double standards as Marc Randazza is PISSED off at Blogger Crystal Cox for registering the Domain Name MarcRandazza.com, yet Marc Randazza defended owning a domain name that accused a man of murdering and raping a young girl. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite.
Yet in a mafai style letter Marc Randazza says to Blogger Crystal Cox, "You really want to Make an Enemy of Me" Marc Randazza does not like it when Freedom of Speech "offends" his delicate senses yet defended the Right for his Client, Isaac Eiland-Hall to buy and own a domain name that accused Glenn Beck of Murder and Rape. Here is some of an Article Regarding Isaac Eiland-Hall and his Attorney Marc Randazza.
"Facing exposure and prosecution, Isaac Eiland-Hall at first denied that he created the “Did Glenn Beck Rape and Murder a Girl in 1990” website. Later, he falsely claimed it was meant as comedy and parody and was therefore legally protected speech. But the court case against Mr. Hall is clear cut. He has slandered and libeled with the intent to do harm.
He infringed upon Mr. Beck’s good name, reputation and copyright. He has sought to profit from lies. He is promoting a radical political agenda for his own secret nefarious purposes. He has made false accusations, akin to crying “Fire!” in a crowded theater. His words are a threat to the livelihood and safety of Glenn Beck and his family.
Mr. Hall has tried to hide behind the cliché of “Freedom of Speech” while in truth attacking the very foundations of American democracy. Our Constitution does not allow for defamation or torturing someone for profit. With freedoms come responsibilities. The damage Hall has done to the reputation of the cheerful and ever-popular Mr. Beck is simply incalculable.
AN AMBULANCE CHASER SMELLS BLOOD
Who is stepping up to defend this criminal? It is none other than Marc J. Randazza, described in his hometown newspaper as a,“slimy liberal incompetent moonbat home-schooled moron lawyer.”
Randazza labels himself with the fancy title “Esquire” as if he’s living in some 19th-century English hamlet wearing a peacock feather in his fedora.
He runs a website entitled, The Legal Satyricon, in reference to a work by an ancient Roman pedophile named Petronius. (The immorality and sexual radicalism of The Satyricon was brought to the big screen some years ago by notorious Italian Federico Fellini.)
Yet in a mafai style letter Marc Randazza says to Blogger Crystal Cox, "You really want to Make an Enemy of Me" Marc Randazza does not like it when Freedom of Speech "offends" his delicate senses yet defended the Right for his Client, Isaac Eiland-Hall to buy and own a domain name that accused Glenn Beck of Murder and Rape. Here is some of an Article Regarding Isaac Eiland-Hall and his Attorney Marc Randazza.
"Facing exposure and prosecution, Isaac Eiland-Hall at first denied that he created the “Did Glenn Beck Rape and Murder a Girl in 1990” website. Later, he falsely claimed it was meant as comedy and parody and was therefore legally protected speech. But the court case against Mr. Hall is clear cut. He has slandered and libeled with the intent to do harm.
He infringed upon Mr. Beck’s good name, reputation and copyright. He has sought to profit from lies. He is promoting a radical political agenda for his own secret nefarious purposes. He has made false accusations, akin to crying “Fire!” in a crowded theater. His words are a threat to the livelihood and safety of Glenn Beck and his family.
Mr. Hall has tried to hide behind the cliché of “Freedom of Speech” while in truth attacking the very foundations of American democracy. Our Constitution does not allow for defamation or torturing someone for profit. With freedoms come responsibilities. The damage Hall has done to the reputation of the cheerful and ever-popular Mr. Beck is simply incalculable.
AN AMBULANCE CHASER SMELLS BLOOD
Who is stepping up to defend this criminal? It is none other than Marc J. Randazza, described in his hometown newspaper as a,“slimy liberal incompetent moonbat home-schooled moron lawyer.”
Randazza labels himself with the fancy title “Esquire” as if he’s living in some 19th-century English hamlet wearing a peacock feather in his fedora.
He runs a website entitled, The Legal Satyricon, in reference to a work by an ancient Roman pedophile named Petronius. (The immorality and sexual radicalism of The Satyricon was brought to the big screen some years ago by notorious Italian Federico Fellini.)
Lawyer Randazza seems to handle only the most salacious of legal cases, mostly involving impoverished bloggers. (You have to wonder what sorts of physical debasements these penniless clients must trade for his services.) He is a professor at a Florida law school (though it’s hard to imagine such a thing) and also claims to be a resident of Gloucester, Massachusetts, a stone’s throw from infamous homosexual politician Barney Frank’s congressional district. Newly-released campaign records show Randazza has been secretly handing off thousands of dollars to Barack Obama’s operatives over the years (evidence here)."
Source and Full Marc Randazza of Corbin Fisher Article
Originally Posted at
Friday, November 23, 2012
Meet the Man Who Has Been Battling Romney and Bain’s Bankruptcy Fraud for 12 Years
"There is something appealing to human beings about a small individual taking on a powerful adversary, and most people are aware of the David and Goliath story where a small insignificant boy took on and defeated a powerful giant because his unwavering faith gave him courage and conviction that right would overcome might. For the past eleven-and-a-half years, one American with unwavering faith in the judicial system has taken on a modern day giant without respite based on a belief that justice is due diligence and that in America, right overcomes might. However, in this circumstance, the system that exists to ensure justice prevails has conflated power with right and gave an already powerful giant a wall of separation from the law, and yet one small individual continues battling for justice against a behemoth.
The giant in this case is Willard Romney’s Bain Capital and their surrogate bankruptcy fraudsters, and the individual battling them for nearly twelve years is Stephen (Laser) Haas, the man hired to liquidate assets in the eToys bankruptcy case. As liquidator, Hass was an officer of the court and head eToys executive with authority to sell the company and its assets to satisfy debtors’ claims while leaving the creditors with no outstanding debt, and to give shareholders relief instead of losing their investments. However, in the course of his duties to maximize returns with minimum expense for the eToys bankruptcy estate, Haas discovered hidden overseas assets, unaccounted for inventory, and that most likely the company was not broke and should not be in bankruptcy.
As an eToys executive, Haas had a legal and fiduciary responsibility to report his discoveries to eToys estate managers and lawyers, and instead of gratitude for doing his job well, he was asked to betray his client for the sake of his future in the liquidation business. When Haas refused the offer to look the other way and allow eToys to be gutted and sold to Bain Capital for free, a Bain Capital surrogate installed his business partner and co-conspirator in other bankruptcies to replace Haas, and colluded to annul a court-approved contract to pay him. As an officer of the court, and 18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony, Mr. Haas, having knowledge of the commission of a felony had a duty, as soon as possible, to make known the same to some judge or other person in civil authority and if he failed to do so, he risked being fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Haas fulfilled his legal duty and reported the malfeasance to the proper authorities.
Shortly after reporting the crimes, in August 2001, George W. Bush appointed another Bain Capital lawyer as U.S. Attorney and he refused to investigate or prosecute the crimes throughout his tenure; despite the U.S. and former Bain attorney’s malfeasance, Haas continued fighting for eToys shareholders and to bring the criminals to justice. During his long battle, Haas discovered attorneys representing the creditors and debtors worked for the same giant (Bain Capital) in the eToys bankruptcy and committed perjury by deliberately failing the mandate to disclose conflict of interest. In what can conservatively be called racketeering, fraud on the court, and miscarriage of justice, the court failed to prosecute or report the crimes then, and continues protecting Bain Capital and its surrogates as recently as last week when the eToys judge postponed a hearing to remove the fraudulent eToys manager in another curious miscarriage of justice.
One might think that after over eleven years, Haas would give up his battle to see justice prevail and shareholders get their just recompense, but his quest for fairness prevents him from relenting. In America, whistle-blowers always pay a steep price for exposing malfeasance, and this case is no different regardless the law is in Haas’s corner. The judge in the bankruptcy case however, is not, and it is extremely suspicious that despite sworn confessions by Bain’s attorneys and surrogates that they committed perjury on the witness stand, the judge fails to hold them accountable, or fulfill her legal responsibility and report the crimes according to 18 U.S.C. §3057(a) . It says, “Any judge, receiver, or trustee having reasonable grounds for believing that any violation under chapter 9 of this title, or other laws of the United States relating to insolvent debtors, receiverships or reorganization plans on destruction of bankruptcy records; [§3284 on concealment of bankrupt's assets] has been committed, or that an investigation should be had in connection therewith, shall report to the appropriate United States attorney all the facts and circumstances of the case, the names of the witnesses and the offense or offenses believed to have been committed.” Bankruptcy judges cannot prosecute civil crimes, but they are required to report them. The eToys judge continues to shirk her legal duty and report the case regardless numerous egregious offenses of perjury and court approved destruction of eToys books and records. Despite Mr. Haas filing motion after motion pleading for the court to do its job, Bain Capital’s surrogates continue to go unpunished or even reported to the U.S. Attorney as required by law.
The eToys case is still ongoing and Laser Haas is still fighting for eToys shareholders without recompense out of his sense of duty to fulfill his role as an eToys executive, and his strong sense of justice. When this author first interviewed him, Haas said going up against the likes of Willard Romney, Bain Capital, and Goldman Sachs was like an “amoeba fighting a giant,” and yet he has persevered without rest for well over a decade. His resolve to see justice prevail, and not monetary gain, have been the motivating force behind his years’ long fight against a powerful adversary. It is noteworthy that Bain Capital’s attorney’s attempted to buy him off and further his professional career if he would just relent and allow the miscarriage of justice to go unimpeded, but he stayed true to his belief that justice is due diligence."
Source
http://www.politicususa.com/meet-man-battling-romney-bains-bankruptcy-fraud-12-years.html
Monday, November 19, 2012
IRS Uses Google For Investigations of Edward Manfredonia
| Visitor Analysis & System Spec | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search Referral: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Host Name: | Browser: | IE 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP Address: | 152.224.232.58 — [Label IP Address] | Operating System: | WinXP | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Location: | Washington, District Of Columbia, United States | Resolution: | 1280x1024 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Returning Visits: | 0 | Javascript: | Enabled | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Length: | Not Applicable | ISP: | Internal Revenue Service | |||||||||||||||||||||
Navigation Path
| Date | Time | WebPage |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov | 08:49:45 |
Friday, November 9, 2012
Steve Dowling of Apple and Bruce Sewell Apple Inc. Know of Massive Liability to APPLE Shareholders. Peter Oppenheimer, Philip W. Schiller of Apple Also Know of Massive Shareholder Liability over the Blatant, Non-Licensed use of the iViewit Video Technology.
Open Letter to Steve Dowling of Apple, Regarding iViewit Technlogy.
"Steve ~ per our telephone call on June 26, 2012 regarding the website url in your name stevedowling.com that we own, please reference the attached Adobe PDF file letter of liabilities for your review and immediate action regarding massive liabilities to Apple Shareholders, Board of Directors and others. There is a time deadline for your response that a failure to respond timely will result in civil and criminal charges against you. Thank you and Have a Great Weekend! ~ Eliot"
Steve Dowling APPLE, Bruce Sewell Apple Inc. - Massive Shareholder Liability KNOWN Liabilities. Steve Dowling and Bruce Sewell REFUSE to Disclose. -
Contact APPLE Executives RIGHT NOW and Demand to Know what is going on with the Massive Liability to Shareholders regarding Apple using a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology, Fully Knowing that the Inventors of this technology, iViewit Technologies, have not licensed APPLE to Use their Technology.
"Steve ~ per our telephone call on June 26, 2012 regarding the website url in your name stevedowling.com that we own, please reference the attached Adobe PDF file letter of liabilities for your review and immediate action regarding massive liabilities to Apple Shareholders, Board of Directors and others. There is a time deadline for your response that a failure to respond timely will result in civil and criminal charges against you. Thank you and Have a Great Weekend! ~ Eliot"
Steve Dowling APPLE, Bruce Sewell Apple Inc. - Massive Shareholder Liability KNOWN Liabilities. Steve Dowling and Bruce Sewell REFUSE to Disclose. -
Contact APPLE Executives RIGHT NOW and Demand to Know what is going on with the Massive Liability to Shareholders regarding Apple using a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology, Fully Knowing that the Inventors of this technology, iViewit Technologies, have not licensed APPLE to Use their Technology.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Judge Marco Hernandez - Expose Judge Marco Hernandez. Judge Marco Hernandez aided and abetted the covering up of a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy in order to Protect Oregons Top Law Firms, Judges, Utility Companies and Department of Justice Employees.
Judge Marco Hernandez
Judge Marco Hernandez Clearly and Deliberately Violated the Constitutional and Lawful Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in Order to Protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Portland General Electric, Bonneville Power, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the many others involved in the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon.
In Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox, Judge Marco Hernandez made obvious unconstitutional and unlawful rulings regarding Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.
Judge Marco Hernandez Violated the Civil and Constitutional Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in order to protect Elite Law Firms and Judges in Portland Oregon.
In order to ensure the Black Cap Project, Wattage Agreements, Solar Loans, BETC Credit Deals, BLM Land Deals, Pacificorp Deals, Portland General Electric Deals, Bonneville Deals and to keep the secrets of the deals in the Summit Bankruptcy, Judge Marco Hernandez was to RULE that Blogger Crystal Cox defamed Obsidian Finance Group and Federally Appointed Bankruptcy Trustee Kevin Padrick. This way, those Big Companies would deal with Obsidian Finance Group and the Billion Dollar Utility Deals could go through. And this way, the Creditors of the Summit Bankruptcy would be none the wiser. See if Judge Marco Hernandez could make it look like it was defamation, then those companies, banks, and other money people would simply discredit Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox and go ahead with those deals.
Oh and of course Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way to DEFAME Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox, endanger her life, incite a mob and ruin her business and life, in order that Judge Michael Simon and all that MONEY he made from the HIGHLY PUBLIC Umpqua Bank Lawsuits of the Summit Bankruptcy, would be something he and Perkins Coie Law Firm would get to keep.
Judge Marco Hernandez made a mockery of the Oregon Retraction Statutes in Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. Oregon Retraction Statutes clearly apply to blogs. However, Judge Marco Hernandez used his "Opinion" as a way to NOT Dismiss Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. This Unlawful, Unconstitutional Ruling affects all Oregon Bloggers. And Blogger Crystal Cox was not even a resident of Oregon.
Judge Marco Hernandez ruled unlawfully in regard to Anti-Slapp Laws.
Judge Marco Hernandez made all bloggers, citizen journalists and new media, the Collateral Damage of Oregon's Wall of Corruption. As Judge Marco Hernandez flatly RULED, set clear precedence, that Bloggers are not protected by the Oregon Shield Law and that Blogs are Not Media, Bloggers are Not Journalist. And therefore Bloggers do NOT have Constitutional Protection.
Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way that claimed that the First Amendment ONLY applies to Big MEDIA, to Big Media Journalist and that the Constitution of the United States does NOT apply to Bloggers, nor to Citizens in general.
Judge Marco Hernandez accused Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox of a crime in his Denial of a New Trial. Thing is, Judge Marco Hernandez did not file a Criminal Complaint, Contact the FBI or bring charges against Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in any way. Yet Judge Marco Hernandez made his very public "Opinion" clear that Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of Extortion and that is why she, I am not media. Because I don't "behave".
Seriously Folks, the Reality is, that if Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of a CRIME, that would have NOTHING to do with whether Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was a journalist, whether blogs are media, or whether bloggers have First Amendment Rights.
In order to protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon, Judge Marco Hernandez ruled directly against the Laws of the United States of America, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Human Rights Laws.
In Judge Marco Hernandez Denial of a New Trial in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Portland Oregon Defamation Case. Judge Marco Hernandez put up a smoke screen to protect Oregon Corruption and accused a Blogger of Extortion, which is Criminal, in a Federal Court Ruling to Deny a New Trial in a "CIVIL" case that had NOTHING to do with Extortion.
Judge Marco Hernandez clearly violated the Constitutional, Civil and Lawful rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox. It is blatant, obvious and defiant.
Judge Marco Hernandez has no accountability and is protected by Judge Michael Simon, Judge Ann Aiken, Senator Ron Wyden, Senator Suzanne Bonamici, Senator Gordon Smith and the Top Utility Companies and Law Firms in the Portland Oregon Culture of Corruption.
Fight Corruption. Demand Judicial Accountability.
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Judge Marco Hernandez Clearly and Deliberately Violated the Constitutional and Lawful Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in Order to Protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon.
In Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox, Judge Marco Hernandez made obvious unconstitutional and unlawful rulings regarding Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.
Judge Marco Hernandez Violated the Civil and Constitutional Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in order to protect Elite Law Firms and Judges in Portland Oregon.
In order to ensure the Black Cap Project, Wattage Agreements, Solar Loans, BETC Credit Deals, BLM Land Deals, Pacificorp Deals, Portland General Electric Deals, Bonneville Deals and to keep the secrets of the deals in the Summit Bankruptcy, Judge Marco Hernandez was to RULE that Blogger Crystal Cox defamed Obsidian Finance Group and Federally Appointed Bankruptcy Trustee Kevin Padrick. This way, those Big Companies would deal with Obsidian Finance Group and the Billion Dollar Utility Deals could go through. And this way, the Creditors of the Summit Bankruptcy would be none the wiser. See if Judge Marco Hernandez could make it look like it was defamation, then those companies, banks, and other money people would simply discredit Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox and go ahead with those deals.
Oh and of course Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way to DEFAME Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox, endanger her life, incite a mob and ruin her business and life, in order that Judge Michael Simon and all that MONEY he made from the HIGHLY PUBLIC Umpqua Bank Lawsuits of the Summit Bankruptcy, would be something he and Perkins Coie Law Firm would get to keep.
Judge Marco Hernandez made a mockery of the Oregon Retraction Statutes in Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. Oregon Retraction Statutes clearly apply to blogs. However, Judge Marco Hernandez used his "Opinion" as a way to NOT Dismiss Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. This Unlawful, Unconstitutional Ruling affects all Oregon Bloggers. And Blogger Crystal Cox was not even a resident of Oregon.
Judge Marco Hernandez ruled unlawfully in regard to Anti-Slapp Laws.
Judge Marco Hernandez made all bloggers, citizen journalists and new media, the Collateral Damage of Oregon's Wall of Corruption. As Judge Marco Hernandez flatly RULED, set clear precedence, that Bloggers are not protected by the Oregon Shield Law and that Blogs are Not Media, Bloggers are Not Journalist. And therefore Bloggers do NOT have Constitutional Protection.
Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way that claimed that the First Amendment ONLY applies to Big MEDIA, to Big Media Journalist and that the Constitution of the United States does NOT apply to Bloggers, nor to Citizens in general.
Judge Marco Hernandez accused Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox of a crime in his Denial of a New Trial. Thing is, Judge Marco Hernandez did not file a Criminal Complaint, Contact the FBI or bring charges against Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in any way. Yet Judge Marco Hernandez made his very public "Opinion" clear that Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of Extortion and that is why she, I am not media. Because I don't "behave".
Seriously Folks, the Reality is, that if Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of a CRIME, that would have NOTHING to do with whether Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was a journalist, whether blogs are media, or whether bloggers have First Amendment Rights.
In order to protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon, Judge Marco Hernandez ruled directly against the Laws of the United States of America, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Human Rights Laws.
In Judge Marco Hernandez Denial of a New Trial in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Portland Oregon Defamation Case. Judge Marco Hernandez put up a smoke screen to protect Oregon Corruption and accused a Blogger of Extortion, which is Criminal, in a Federal Court Ruling to Deny a New Trial in a "CIVIL" case that had NOTHING to do with Extortion.
Judge Marco Hernandez clearly violated the Constitutional, Civil and Lawful rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox. It is blatant, obvious and defiant.
Judge Marco Hernandez has no accountability and is protected by Judge Michael Simon, Judge Ann Aiken, Senator Ron Wyden, Senator Suzanne Bonamici, Senator Gordon Smith and the Top Utility Companies and Law Firms in the Portland Oregon Culture of Corruption.
Fight Corruption. Demand Judicial Accountability.
For More Research on the
Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Case
Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Case
http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/
http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/
http://www.kevinpadrick.com/
http://www.objectiontofees.com/
http://kevinpadrickobsidianfinance.blogspot.com/
http://www.patriciawhittington.com/
http://www.leonsimson.blogspot.com/
http://www.stevenhedberg.com/
Summit Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Blog
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Blogger Crystal Cox Alleges that Dr. Ben Eliason of St. Charles Medical Center in Bend Oregon was involved in the intimidation, incarceration, harassment, criminal endangered and attempt to permanently silence an insider on a $40 Million Dollar in order to protect Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, Tonkon Torp, David Aman and others involved and making millions monthly regarding the Summit Bankruptcy Case.
Part Two Interview
Patricia Whittington, Obsidian Finance Group, David S. Aman, Kevin Padrick, HIPAA Violations, Hipaa Privacy, St Charles HIPAA, Illegal Incarceration, Psychiatric Rights, Patients Rights, Dr. Ben Eliason, Cascade Health Care, St. Charles Hospital
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Obsidian Finance Group LLC had a Contract with Summit dated December 18th 2008.. Obsidian Finance Group worked with Summit to help them reorganize even before this date, and ALL was BEFORE Summit filed for Bankruptcy. Is this NOT a Violation of Bankruptcy Code? Did Kevin Padrick REALLY not Break any Laws in the Summit Bankruptcy? I Say that INDEED Kevin Padrick and David Aman, Oregon Attorneys DID Break the Law and Violate Bankruptcy Code in the Summit 1031 / Summit Accommodators, Inc. Bankruptcy.
Obsidian Finance Group Contract with Summit Accommodators, Inc. December 18th 2008
Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick, Patty Whittington and David W. Brown LIED under oath, regarding the Summit Bankruptcy. No matter how much they twist the Truth, the Facts speak for themselves. And Kevin Padrick, Patty Whittington and David W. Brown know full well that they did NOT tell the Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing But.
Obsidian Finance Group Kevin Padrick, LIES, under oath,
and claims that this contract did not exist.
Click Below for Information Regarding Kevin Padrick's Testimony
More information regarding what sure looks to me to be PERJURY, Under Oath Lies by Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick, Patty Whittington and David W. Brown
http://www.patriciawhittington.com/2012/10/the-summit-bankruptcy-was-debtor-in.html
Click Below for Information Regarding Patty Whittington's Testimony
http://www.patriciawhittington.com/2012/05/under-oath-testimony-of-patricia.html
Click Below for Information Regarding David W. Brown's Testimony
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/02/david-w-brown-obsidian-finance-group.htmHere is the Obsidian Finance Group Contract with Summit Accommodators, Inc.
December 18th 2008.
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/obsidian-agreement.pdf
Click Below for the the Full Trial Transcript from Obsidian V. Cox, where by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox questioned Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick, Patty Whittington and David W. Brown UNDER Oath, regarding the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts
From the Summit Bk Justice Whistle Blower Blog
"The principals of Summit contracted with Kevin Padrick & Obsidian Finance in December of 2008 prior to filing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.
Kevin Padrick had assured them that his company was the right one to use in order to get the maximum value returned to the creditors.
The shareholders had been in the dark so long, they were growing concerned with the lack of action and communications from Summit’s Bankruptcy attorneys, Sussman Shank.
Kevin Padrick had not communicated with Terry Vance (the Chief Restructuring Officer at this time, or rather, Obsidian Finance’s boss) since Obsidian Finance was hired by Summit 1031 back in December of 2008."
Source of Above Quote and More Information Regarding this Matter
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=254
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Proskauer Rose Law Firm involved in Massive Shareholder Fraud. Proskauer Rose Lawyers Continue to Cover Up Information that will Cost Shareholder Billions.
Gerald Lewin Corruption Over Iviewit Stolen Technology.
Gerald Lewin is Corrupt. What Judges, Attorney, DOJ officials, SEC Officials Protect the Corruption of Gerald Lewin? Goldstein & Lewin
Exhibit 26 – Gerald Lewin response to his client starting to use I View It Technologies
Exhibit 3 – Timeline of Incidents and allegations, hints and innuendo’s
Exhibit 29 – How not to create an excel sheet
Exhibit 30 – What happened on the way to Bankruptcy?
Exhibit 27 – Infringers
Exhibit 28 - Endorsements
Exhibit Final
143rd SMPTE Technical Conference and Exhibition
Hilton New York, November 4-7, 2001
Possible Enforcement Remedy
Gerald Lewin Video to Try and Get Hired by Iviewit...
Gerald Lewin Committed Massive FRAUD in the Iviewit Scandal,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjtW7DyQlqY
GERALD R. LEWIN, CPA - GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO;
ERIKA LEWIN, CPA - GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO;
JENNIFER LEWIN;
http://iviewit.tv/company/index.htm
Originally Posted At
http://stolenpatent.blogspot.com/2010/10/gerald-lewin-corruption-over-iviewit.html
"FBI Coverups, Boca Police Scandals, Major Law Firms Covering Corruption, Enron Collapsing, Attempted Murder, Invention Stolen, Denial of Due Process.
Proskauer Rose Corruption
In America only Certain People have rights to Protection from the Law - Most All are just Collateral Damage to Protect Corrupt Attorneys, Judges, DOJ Officials, Corrupt FBI agents, Billionaire Tech Companies, Major Media Companies and Mega Law Firms.
Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...
"" KernelOfTruth says:
There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).
The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.
The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.
If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.
If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf
The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involvingpublic corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.
He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.
The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his nameand place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler ofProskauer Rose.
According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.
This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also byStephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.
Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.
For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.
Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s courtand the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.
Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose andProskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).
RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured byProskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.
With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.
Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:
(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill
(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in abankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and
(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.
It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.
Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.
The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.
Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.
All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who hadperpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.
For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.
The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],
..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departmentswhen the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],
...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and LardnerLaw Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].
The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special AgentJoseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.
Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit orEliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],
.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,
... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]
The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.
We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.
Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.
I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.
A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.
In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.
Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota ofprotection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.
Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""
Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.
Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees "
Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...
"" KernelOfTruth says:
There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).
The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.
The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.
If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.
If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf
The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involvingpublic corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.
He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.
The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his nameand place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler ofProskauer Rose.
According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.
This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also byStephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.
Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.
For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.
Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s courtand the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.
Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose andProskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).
RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured byProskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.
With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.
Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:
(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill
(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in abankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and
(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.
It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.
Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.
The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.
Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.
All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who hadperpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.
For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.
The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],
..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departmentswhen the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],
...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and LardnerLaw Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].
The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special AgentJoseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.
Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit orEliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],
.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,
... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]
The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.
We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.
Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.
I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.
A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.
In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.
Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota ofprotection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.
Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""
Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.
Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees "
Originally Posted At
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC and FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro, against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Proskauer Rose
"SEC Complaint Filed, is the SEC Listening .. It Does not sound like it. The SEC must be covering up for Favors owed, covering and protecting billionair tech companies and Above the Law Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner and Proskauer Rose.
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.
"" March 14, 2010 --
FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS
Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years &allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,
“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.
The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf
12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT
Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.
Anderson’s testimonyhttp://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205
Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165
HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.
Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.
Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).
As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.
Anderson’s filing
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf
Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf
The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.
Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""
"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder
Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke
US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner
USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer
Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "
Press Release for Immediate Release"
Originally Posted At
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)