Friday, November 23, 2012

Meet the Man Who Has Been Battling Romney and Bain’s Bankruptcy Fraud for 12 Years




"There is something appealing to human beings about a small individual taking on a powerful adversary, and most people are aware of the David and Goliath story where a small insignificant boy took on and defeated a powerful giant because his unwavering faith gave him courage and conviction that right would overcome might. For the past eleven-and-a-half years, one American with unwavering faith in the judicial system has taken on a modern day giant without respite based on a belief that justice is due diligence and that in America, right overcomes might. However, in this circumstance, the system that exists to ensure justice prevails has conflated power with right and gave an already powerful giant a wall of separation from the law, and yet one small individual continues battling for justice against a behemoth.

The giant in this case is Willard Romney’s Bain Capital and their surrogate bankruptcy fraudsters, and the individual battling them for nearly twelve years is Stephen (Laser) Haas, the man hired to liquidate assets in the eToys bankruptcy case. As liquidator, Hass was an officer of the court and head eToys executive with authority to sell the company and its assets to satisfy debtors’ claims while leaving the creditors with no outstanding debt, and to give shareholders relief instead of losing their investments. However, in the course of his duties to maximize returns with minimum expense for the eToys bankruptcy estate, Haas discovered hidden overseas assets, unaccounted for inventory, and that most likely the company was not broke and should not be in bankruptcy.

As an eToys executive, Haas had a legal and fiduciary responsibility to report his discoveries to eToys estate managers and lawyers, and instead of gratitude for doing his job well, he was asked to betray his client for the sake of his future in the liquidation business. When Haas refused the offer to look the other way and allow eToys to be gutted and sold to Bain Capital for free, a Bain Capital surrogate installed his business partner and co-conspirator in other bankruptcies to replace Haas, and colluded to annul a court-approved contract to pay him. As an officer of the court, and 18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony, Mr. Haas, having knowledge of the commission of a felony had a duty, as soon as possible, to make known the same to some judge or other person in civil authority and if he failed to do so, he risked being fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Haas fulfilled his legal duty and reported the malfeasance to the proper authorities.

Shortly after reporting the crimes, in August 2001, George W. Bush appointed another Bain Capital lawyer as U.S. Attorney and he refused to investigate or prosecute the crimes throughout his tenure; despite the U.S. and former Bain attorney’s malfeasance, Haas continued fighting for eToys shareholders and to bring the criminals to justice. During his long battle, Haas discovered attorneys representing the creditors and debtors worked for the same giant (Bain Capital) in the eToys bankruptcy and committed perjury by deliberately failing the mandate to disclose conflict of interest. In what can conservatively be called racketeering, fraud on the court, and miscarriage of justice, the court failed to prosecute or report the crimes then, and continues protecting Bain Capital and its surrogates as recently as last week when the eToys judge postponed a hearing to remove the fraudulent eToys manager in another curious miscarriage of justice.

One might think that after over eleven years, Haas would give up his battle to see justice prevail and shareholders get their just recompense, but his quest for fairness prevents him from relenting. In America, whistle-blowers always pay a steep price for exposing malfeasance, and this case is no different regardless the law is in Haas’s corner. The judge in the bankruptcy case however, is not, and it is extremely suspicious that despite sworn confessions by Bain’s attorneys and surrogates that they committed perjury on the witness stand, the judge fails to hold them accountable, or fulfill her legal responsibility and report the crimes  according to 18 U.S.C. §3057(a) . It says, “Any judge, receiver, or trustee having reasonable grounds for believing that any violation under chapter 9 of this title, or other laws of the United States relating to insolvent debtors, receiverships or reorganization plans on destruction of bankruptcy records; [§3284 on concealment of bankrupt's assets] has been committed, or that an investigation should be had in connection therewith, shall report to the appropriate United States attorney all the facts and circumstances of the case, the names of the witnesses and the offense or offenses believed to have been committed.” Bankruptcy judges cannot prosecute civil crimes, but they are required to report them. The eToys judge continues to shirk her legal duty and report the case regardless numerous egregious offenses of perjury and court approved destruction of eToys books and records. Despite Mr. Haas filing motion after motion pleading for the court to do its job, Bain Capital’s surrogates continue to go unpunished or even reported to the U.S. Attorney as required by law.

The eToys case is still ongoing and Laser Haas is still fighting for eToys shareholders without recompense out of his sense of duty to fulfill his role as an eToys executive, and his strong sense of justice. When this author first interviewed him, Haas said going up against the likes of Willard Romney, Bain Capital, and Goldman Sachs was like an “amoeba fighting a giant,” and yet he has persevered without rest for well over a decade. His resolve to see justice prevail, and not monetary gain, have been the motivating force behind his years’ long fight against a powerful adversary. It is noteworthy that Bain Capital’s attorney’s attempted to buy him off and further his professional career if he would just relent and allow the miscarriage of justice to go unimpeded, but he stayed true to his belief that justice is due diligence."

Source
http://www.politicususa.com/meet-man-battling-romney-bains-bankruptcy-fraud-12-years.html

Monday, November 19, 2012

IRS Uses Google For Investigations of Edward Manfredonia

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:
Host Name:Browser:IE 8.0
IP Address:152.224.232.58 — [Label IP Address]Operating System:WinXP
Location:Washington, District Of Columbia, United StatesResolution:1280x1024
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Not ApplicableISP:Internal Revenue Service

Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage
  
19 Nov08:49:45

Friday, November 9, 2012

Steve Dowling of Apple and Bruce Sewell Apple Inc. Know of Massive Liability to APPLE Shareholders. Peter Oppenheimer, Philip W. Schiller of Apple Also Know of Massive Shareholder Liability over the Blatant, Non-Licensed use of the iViewit Video Technology.

Open Letter to Steve Dowling of Apple, Regarding iViewit Technlogy.

"Steve ~  per our telephone call on June 26, 2012 regarding the website url in your name stevedowling.com that we own, please reference the attached Adobe PDF file letter of liabilities for your review and immediate action regarding massive liabilities to Apple Shareholders, Board of Directors and others.  There is a time deadline for your response that a failure to respond timely will result in civil and criminal charges against you.  Thank you and Have a Great Weekend!  ~ Eliot"



Steve Dowling APPLE, Bruce Sewell Apple Inc. - Massive Shareholder Liability KNOWN Liabilities. Steve Dowling and Bruce Sewell REFUSE to Disclose. -

Contact APPLE Executives RIGHT NOW and Demand to Know what is going on with the Massive Liability to Shareholders regarding Apple using a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology, Fully Knowing that the Inventors of this technology, iViewit Technologies, have not licensed APPLE to Use their Technology.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Judge Marco Hernandez - Expose Judge Marco Hernandez. Judge Marco Hernandez aided and abetted the covering up of a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy in order to Protect Oregons Top Law Firms, Judges, Utility Companies and Department of Justice Employees.


Judge Marco Hernandez

Judge Marco Hernandez Clearly and Deliberately Violated the Constitutional and Lawful Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in Order to Protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Portland General Electric, Bonneville Power, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the many others involved in the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon.

In Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal CoxJudge Marco Hernandez made obvious unconstitutional and unlawful rulings regarding Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.

Judge Marco Hernandez Violated the Civil and Constitutional Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in order to protect Elite Law Firms and Judges in Portland Oregon.

In order to ensure the Black Cap Project, Wattage Agreements, Solar Loans, BETC Credit Deals, BLM Land Deals, Pacificorp Deals, Portland General Electric Deals, Bonneville Deals and to keep the secrets of the deals in the Summit Bankruptcy, Judge Marco Hernandez was to RULE that Blogger Crystal Cox defamed Obsidian Finance Group and Federally Appointed Bankruptcy Trustee Kevin Padrick. This way, those Big Companies would deal with Obsidian Finance Group and the Billion Dollar Utility Deals could go through. And this way, the Creditors of the Summit Bankruptcy would be none the wiser. See if Judge Marco Hernandez could make it look like it was defamation, then those companies, banks, and other money people would simply discredit Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox and go ahead with those deals.

Oh and of course Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way to DEFAME Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox, endanger her life, incite a mob and ruin her business and life, in order that Judge Michael Simon and all that MONEY he made from the HIGHLY PUBLIC Umpqua Bank Lawsuits of the Summit Bankruptcy, would be something he and Perkins Coie Law Firm would get to keep.

Judge Marco Hernandemade a mockery of the Oregon Retraction Statutes in Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox.  Oregon Retraction Statutes clearly apply to blogs. However, Judge Marco Hernandez used his "Opinion" as a way to NOT Dismiss Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. This Unlawful, Unconstitutional Ruling affects all Oregon Bloggers. And Blogger Crystal Cox was not even a resident of Oregon.

Judge Marco Hernandez ruled unlawfully in regard to Anti-Slapp Laws.

Judge Marco Hernandez made all bloggers, citizen journalists and new media, the Collateral Damage of Oregon's Wall of Corruption.  As Judge Marco Hernandez flatly RULED, set clear precedence, that Bloggers are not protected by the Oregon Shield Law and that Blogs are Not Media, Bloggers are Not Journalist. And therefore Bloggers do NOT have Constitutional Protection.

Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way that claimed that the First Amendment ONLY applies to Big MEDIA, to Big Media Journalist and that the Constitution of the United States does NOT apply to Bloggers, nor to Citizens in general.

Judge Marco Hernandez accused Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox of a crime in his Denial of a New Trial. Thing is, Judge Marco Hernandez did not file a Criminal Complaint, Contact the FBI or bring charges against Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in any way. Yet Judge Marco Hernandez made his very public "Opinion" clear that Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of Extortion and that is why she, I am not media. Because I don't "behave".

Seriously Folks, the Reality is, that if Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of a CRIME, that would have NOTHING to do with whether Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was a journalist, whether blogs are media, or whether bloggers have First Amendment Rights.

In order to protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon, Judge Marco Hernandez ruled directly against the Laws of the United States of America, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Human Rights Laws.

In Judge Marco Hernandez Denial of a New Trial in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Portland Oregon Defamation Case. Judge Marco Hernandez put up a smoke screen to protect Oregon Corruption and accused a Blogger of Extortion, which is Criminal, in a Federal Court Ruling to Deny a New Trial in a "CIVIL" case that had NOTHING to do with Extortion.

Judge Marco Hernandez clearly violated the Constitutional, Civil and Lawful rights of  Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.  It is blatant, obvious and defiant.

Judge Marco Hernandez has no accountability and is protected by Judge Michael Simon, Judge Ann Aiken, Senator Ron WydenSenator Suzanne BonamiciSenator Gordon Smith and the Top Utility Companies and Law Firms in the Portland Oregon Culture of Corruption.

Fight Corruption.  Demand Judicial Accountability.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Judge Marco Hernandez Clearly and Deliberately Violated the Constitutional and Lawful Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in Order to Protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon.


In Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox, Judge Marco Hernandez made obvious unconstitutional and unlawful rulings regarding Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.

Judge Marco Hernandez Violated the Civil and Constitutional Rights of Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in order to protect Elite Law Firms and Judges in Portland Oregon.

In order to ensure the Black Cap Project, Wattage Agreements, Solar Loans, BETC Credit Deals, BLM Land Deals, Pacificorp Deals, Portland General Electric Deals, Bonneville Deals and to keep the secrets of the deals in the Summit Bankruptcy, Judge Marco Hernandez was to RULE that Blogger Crystal Cox defamed Obsidian Finance Group and Federally Appointed Bankruptcy Trustee Kevin Padrick. This way, those Big Companies would deal with Obsidian Finance Group and the Billion Dollar Utility Deals could go through. And this way, the Creditors of the Summit Bankruptcy would be none the wiser. See if Judge Marco Hernandez could make it look like it was defamation, then those companies, banks, and other money people would simply discredit Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox and go ahead with those deals.

Oh and of course Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way to DEFAME Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox, endanger her life, incite a mob and ruin her business and life, in order that Judge Michael Simon and all that MONEY he made from the HIGHLY PUBLIC Umpqua Bank Lawsuits of the Summit Bankruptcy, would be something he and Perkins Coie Law Firm would get to keep.

Judge Marco Hernandez made a mockery of the Oregon Retraction Statutes in Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox.  Oregon Retraction Statutes clearly apply to blogs. However, Judge Marco Hernandez used his "Opinion" as a way to NOT Dismiss Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. This Unlawful, Unconstitutional Ruling affects all Oregon Bloggers. And Blogger Crystal Cox was not even a resident of Oregon.

Judge Marco Hernandez ruled unlawfully in regard to Anti-Slapp Laws.

Judge Marco Hernandez made all bloggers, citizen journalists and new media, the Collateral Damage of Oregon's Wall of Corruption.  As Judge Marco Hernandez flatly RULED, set clear precedence, that Bloggers are not protected by the Oregon Shield Law and that Blogs are Not Media, Bloggers are Not Journalist. And therefore Bloggers do NOT have Constitutional Protection.

Judge Marco Hernandez ruled in a way that claimed that the First Amendment ONLY applies to Big MEDIA, to Big Media Journalist and that the Constitution of the United States does NOT apply to Bloggers, nor to Citizens in general.

Judge Marco Hernandez accused Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox of a crime in his Denial of a New Trial. Thing is, Judge Marco Hernandez did not file a Criminal Complaint, Contact the FBI or bring charges against Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in any way. Yet Judge Marco Hernandez made his very public "Opinion" clear that Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of Extortion and that is why she, I am not media. Because I don't "behave".

Seriously Folks, the Reality is, that if Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was guilty of a CRIME, that would have NOTHING to do with whether Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox was a journalist, whether blogs are media, or whether bloggers have First Amendment Rights.

In order to protect Judge Michael H. Simon, PacifiCorp, Perkins Coie Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Miller Nash Law Firm, Judge Randall Dunn, DOJ Trustee Pamela Griffith and the Culture of Corruption Portland Oregon, Judge Marco Hernandez ruled directly against the Laws of the United States of America, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Human Rights Laws.

In Judge Marco Hernandez Denial of a New Trial in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Portland Oregon Defamation Case. Judge Marco Hernandez put up a smoke screen to protect Oregon Corruption and accused a Blogger of Extortion, which is Criminal, in a Federal Court Ruling to Deny a New Trial in a "CIVIL" case that had NOTHING to do with Extortion.

Judge Marco Hernandez clearly violated the Constitutional, Civil and Lawful rights of  Pro Se Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox.  It is blatant, obvious and defiant.

Judge Marco Hernandez has no accountability and is protected by Judge Michael Simon, Judge Ann Aiken, Senator Ron WydenSenator Suzanne Bonamici, Senator Gordon Smith and the Top Utility Companies and Law Firms in the Portland Oregon Culture of Corruption.

Fight Corruption.  Demand Judicial Accountability.





For More Research on the
Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox Case


http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/

http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/

http://www.kevinpadrick.com/

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

http://kevinpadrickobsidianfinance.blogspot.com/

http://www.patriciawhittington.com/

http://www.leonsimson.blogspot.com/

http://www.stevenhedberg.com/

Summit Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Blog



Thursday, November 1, 2012

Blogger Crystal Cox Alleges that Dr. Ben Eliason of St. Charles Medical Center in Bend Oregon was involved in the intimidation, incarceration, harassment, criminal endangered and attempt to permanently silence an insider on a $40 Million Dollar in order to protect Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, Tonkon Torp, David Aman and others involved and making millions monthly regarding the Summit Bankruptcy Case.


Eliot Bernstein, April 18th 2010 Interview with Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Stephanie DeYoung While Illegally Hospitalized against Her Will at St. Charles Medical Center in order to silence her Outspoken, Whistle Blowing regarding the Summit Bankruptcy.

Dr. Ben Eliason was in charge of this unlawful, human rights violation, civil rights violation, HIPAA Violation, illegal incarceration, and will soon face a criminal complaint and HIPPA Criminal Complaint being filed by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

Patricia Whittington Obsidian Finance Group VP was on the Hospital Board. And is believed to be involved with the leaking of case numbers and private medical information.

Part One of Interview


Part Two Interview







Patricia Whittington, Obsidian Finance Group, David S. Aman, Kevin Padrick, HIPAA Violations, Hipaa Privacy, St Charles HIPAA, Illegal Incarceration, Psychiatric Rights, Patients Rights, Dr. Ben Eliason, Cascade Health Care, St. Charles Hospital