SEC Complaint involving Proskauer Rose Law Firm. What is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose Doing About the iViewit Case?

"Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner

IVIEWIT PRESS RELEASE SEC, FBI AND MORE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS - READ ALL ABOUT IT

Copy of Press Release at the Totally Awesome Free Press Release @ http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner

SUMMARY

The SEC & DOJ notified of the alleged Major Shareholder Fraud by these leading blue chip companies & Shareholders need to be aware of the Iviewit Complaint and undisclosed massive liabilities.

FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS

Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.

FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

The SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010, “Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

ADDRESSED TO:

SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder
Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke
US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser

Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner
USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz

US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer
Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio

MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI

A SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.
The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf "

Source of Post

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

Posted here by 

Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox

What is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose Doing About the iViewit Case?

The Guilt of Proskauer Rose is proven over and over without a doubt and yet Proskauer Rose seems to think that taking my Domain Names is the way to STOP the Truth about Proskauer Rose LLP and their involvement Stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar technology. 

Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose Law Firm Florida Bar Complaint

Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose Law Firm Florida Bar Complaint

"FLORIDA BAR COMPLAINT – PART TWO

MATTHEW H. TRIGGS THE LAW OF FIRM PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

Page 7 of 63

Thursday, July 22, 2004 - 7:50:10 AM

and other state and federal agencies, all to the detriment of Iviewit shareholders

by loss of rights and ownership in the patents, and all appear to benefit

Proskauer;

xiii. Proskauer set up identically named corporations to receive patents, whereby the

shareholders of Iviewit, venture capital firms invested in Iviewit and the

inventors now hold no definable interest in such exactly identical named

company as the Proskauer Entity, according to OED, certain core technologies

which are supposed to be owned by Iviewit and invented by Iviewit inventors

are not, and although listed as Iviewit assets by Proskauer for inducement to

invest, they end up in the Proskauer Entity or other John Doe companies that

may not be known to exist, all through fraud and deceit;

xiv. all of these actions have now caused actions in the state Supreme Courts of

New York and Florida and federal actions by the USPTO Commissioner of

Patents (“Commissioner”) as will be recited herein.

xv. The cost of this “corporate general advice and corporate set-up” as Proskauer

bills for it, cost Iviewit, a start-up technology company with intellectual

property, approximately eight hundred thousand dollars ($800,000.00) with

none of that bill for protecting the patents, according to the Proskauer story.

According to Proskauer’s tale but the truth of this, and it is Iviewit’s contention

all along, that Proskauer falsified all of their bill and further submitted such

false and fraudulent records, whereby in an attempt to cover up after being

caught, and now for an additional two years as Iviewit learned what happened in

this conspiracy, whereby patent work in the billings and hosts of meetings in the

beginning of the Iviewit and Proskauer relationship are all missing from bills

Proskauer submitted in the Litigation, all evidenced prior in the Wheeler

Complaint. In fact, much of the bill submitted to the 15C, in the billing case is

on an Iviewit entity that does not exist or whereby other billings are missing for

each of the 13 companies known.

Further, in the original billing case Proskauer levied on Iviewit, Proskauer in fact sued entities that they factually had no billings or retainers with, some of which appear to be attempts to build debt on

Iviewit patent companies, which at the time seemed very strange when Complainant did not know such companies at the time held patents as it was not discovered by OED at that time, yet it seem strange and Proskauer was forced to re-file the complaint against Iviewit in the 15C.

xvi. Which after changing such billings, to remove Kenneth Rubenstein

(“Rubenstein”) State of New York Supreme Court – Appellate Division First

Department (“NY Department”) Docket 2003.0531 (“Rubenstein Complaint”),

Rubenstein, Wheeler and Rubenstein felt confident in deposition stating they

new nothing of the technologies and did no patent work, and other such false

and misleading statements, made to tribunals inapposite the truth. Complainant

feels that a review of such matters as in the Wheeler Complaint alone, will

prove these statements false.

Source and Full Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose Law Firm Florida Bar Complaint

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2007%2022%20TRIGGS%20BAR%20COMPLAINT%20-%20PROSKAUER%20BOOKMARKED.pdf

Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose LLP named in SEC Complaint

https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Kenneth Rubenstein to this day, covers up the FACT that he helped MPEG LA get control of the Iviewit Technology and illegally put this Patent into patent pools.

Kenneth Rubenstein is So Far above the LAW as protected by Judicial Corruption in New York. Kenneth Rubenstein was long since protected by Corrupt Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye who protected her then husband Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose Partner.

Here are Some Documents on Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose.

1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it.

Kenneth Rubenstein Starts Patent Pool

Kenneth Rubenstein - Above the Law Click Here

Proskauer Rose Connections - Crime Chart - Click Here

2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies

1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.

1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.

1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

MPEG LA has Revolutionized, Perfected the Blatant, Intellectual Property Rights Theft of Inventors Like Iviewit Technologies.

Revolutionizing Intellectual Property Rights Management is what MPEG LA Claims to be all about. However, MPEG LA has being making Billions a Year off of an invention that they stole from the iViewit Technologies inventors, with the Help of their Corrupt Patent Review Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein of the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

My Words are in Blue from the MPEGLA.com Quote...

"We are the world’s leading packager of patent pools for standards and other technology platforms used in consumer electronics, as well as chemical, eCommerce, education, energy, environment, healthcare and biotechnology, manufacturing and materials, transportation and wireless technology.

Translation: MPEG LA is the Worlds Leader in Illegal Patent Pools. MPEG LA Steals Technology from inventors such as the Iviewit Technologies Company and then pools this STOLEN Technology in "patent pools" to disguise the rightful owner of the technology, then they Illegal License this Stolen Technology.

We developed the pool market space. Our business model supports a large number of patent users – creating reasonable access and profitable opportunities for all parties.

Translation: MPEG LA "developed" the Patent - Technology Stealing "Space". Translation: MPEG LA's business model STEALS FROM A Large number of Inventors.. and Licenses the Technology they Steal such as the iViewit Technology.

Our "many-to-many licensing model" has revolutionized the way patent holders, developers and users think about the intellectual property market. Our model serves the entire community of participants – creating a market that balances reasonable access with reasonable return.

Translation: MPEG LA, many to many means we steal a whole lot of technology, and MPEG LA illegally licenses what Inventors invent and Do NOT pay the Inventors for the Technology and I suspect MPEG LA even tried to Murder the iViewit Inventors.. just my Guess.. look at the Car Bombing photos at www.Iviewit.TV

• Bringing together essential patents ( Stealing Technology.. Essentially .. )
• Enabling technology to be more widely used
• Making technology accessible (Killing Inventors, Taking what they invented and making it accessible to the world . )
• Saving time
• Averting legal costs and concerns (by NOT pay the Inventor of the Technology they Sell.. and License)
• Allowing for investment in product and reinvestment in innovation ( Stealing Inventions Pays WELL)
• MPEG LA is audited annually in accordance with SAS 70 Type II (NOT a Chance this is TRUE)

Preparing the market for mass adoption (preparing inventors to be screwed over massively)

Our Many-to-Many Licensing Model maximizes creativity, usage, profitability and affordability of products.

Mass adoption leads to success

Our goal is to provide a service that brings all parties together so that technical innovations can be made widely available at a reasonable price. Utilizing our collaborative approach, we help make markets for intellectual property that maximize profits for intellectual property owners and make utilization of intellectual property affordable for manufacturers, consumers and other users."

Flat Out Lies By MPEG LA

http://www.mpegla.com/main/Pages/About.aspx

MPEG LA is Corrupt. Coming Soon EVERY Skeleton in the MPEG LA Closet - Know of Any? eMail Me Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger, Crystal@CrystalCox.com