Monday, April 18, 2011
Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose LLP named in SEC Complaint
https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Friday, April 15, 2011
Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Rose LLP files fraudulant complaint to WIPO and Flat Out lies about Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
I have never owned MatthewTriggs.com - yet Above the Law Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Senior Counsel Jenifer deWolf Paine Harass Me, Defame Me and send press releases out about my actions that flat out lie.
Matthew Triggs is a named defendendant in a 13 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit over stealing the iViewit Technology, yet Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose is upset after almost 2 years now of me Exposing his part in the Stealing of the iViewit Technology, so what does Proskauer Rose Law Firm do ? Do they seek to rid the "Firm" of the attorneys that violate civil and constitutional rights and break the law? NOPE, instead they try and silence the Blogger that is posting the Truth about the Proskauer Rose Attorney committing these Crimes.
Here is Part of the Complaint that Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Senior Counsel Jenifer deWolf Paine filed to defame and harass investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox.
Also Note Below in this harassment, Proskauer Rose LLP seems to be using my name, as an Investigative Blogger to defend issues with Eliot Bernstein of iViewit and to name and state facts of a case that has nothing to do with me, other then me Reporting on it. What I choose to put on a domain name, a blog has nothing to do with those i report on..
Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose LLP
So Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Senior Counsel Jenifer deWolf Paine on behalf of Matthew Triggs, named in a Federal RICO Complaint and a massive legal suits over the iViewit Stolen Technology, including an SEC Complaint.. well they DEFAME and Harass Blogger Crystal L. Cox for Exposing Matthew Triggs,and then they go Online and Register the Very name they accuse me of owning, the very day they file the WIPO complaint against me and email Godaddy, as well as email to press release teh lies about me..
MatthewTriggs.com is Really Owned by the Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose.
Registrant:
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: MATTHEWTRIGGS.COM
Created on: 15-Apr-11
Expires on: 15-Apr-16
Last Updated on: 15-Apr-11
Administrative Contact:
Polk, Greg gpolk@proskauer.com
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
(212) 969-5488
Technical Contact:
Feliciano, Lissette lfeliciano@proskauer.com
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
(212) 969-4057
Domain servers in listed order:
NS71.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS72.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Buying the dotcom of Someone else is done by many, and it is not Cyber Squatting.. you did not own the names your attacking me on .. someone buys them and then you attack them..
Matthew Triggs is a named defendendant in a 13 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit over stealing the iViewit Technology, yet Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose is upset after almost 2 years now of me Exposing his part in the Stealing of the iViewit Technology, so what does Proskauer Rose Law Firm do ? Do they seek to rid the "Firm" of the attorneys that violate civil and constitutional rights and break the law? NOPE, instead they try and silence the Blogger that is posting the Truth about the Proskauer Rose Attorney committing these Crimes.
Here is Part of the Complaint that Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Senior Counsel Jenifer deWolf Paine filed to defame and harass investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox.
Also Note Below in this harassment, Proskauer Rose LLP seems to be using my name, as an Investigative Blogger to defend issues with Eliot Bernstein of iViewit and to name and state facts of a case that has nothing to do with me, other then me Reporting on it. What I choose to put on a domain name, a blog has nothing to do with those i report on..
and I do NOT Own MatthewTriggs.com
Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose LLP
So Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Senior Counsel Jenifer deWolf Paine on behalf of Matthew Triggs, named in a Federal RICO Complaint and a massive legal suits over the iViewit Stolen Technology, including an SEC Complaint.. well they DEFAME and Harass Blogger Crystal L. Cox for Exposing Matthew Triggs,and then they go Online and Register the Very name they accuse me of owning, the very day they file the WIPO complaint against me and email Godaddy, as well as email to press release teh lies about me..
MatthewTriggs.com is Really Owned by the Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose.
Registrant:
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: MATTHEWTRIGGS.COM
Created on: 15-Apr-11
Expires on: 15-Apr-16
Last Updated on: 15-Apr-11
Administrative Contact:
Polk, Greg gpolk@proskauer.com
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
(212) 969-5488
Technical Contact:
Feliciano, Lissette lfeliciano@proskauer.com
Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
United States
(212) 969-4057
Domain servers in listed order:
NS71.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS72.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Buying the dotcom of Someone else is done by many, and it is not Cyber Squatting.. you did not own the names your attacking me on .. someone buys them and then you attack them..
Jim Rogers, Senior Counsel to the Attorney General
James Rogers, Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to the Attorney General
Your Representing 39 defendants,
the AG office,
so We are defendants in a Suit that you Filed?
So our Office is a Named Defendant in that Lawsuit? YES
Well I Can't Talk to You.
if you Are a Plaintiff in a Lawsuit where my office is a Named Defendent, I Can't Talk To You.
I "think" we have to have Outside Counsel to Represent Us.
"the Conversation is over, I am a defendant in a Case that You brought against this Agency."
Send me the Complaint and Our Counsel Will Get Back to You
James.Rogers@ag.ny.gov - he says send the complaint and our counsel will get in touch with you.
as Soon as We legally open the lines of communication, we will get Back to You.
So what will James Rogers Senior Counsel to the New York Attorney General Really Do?
Your Representing 39 defendants,
the AG office,
so We are defendants in a Suit that you Filed?
So our Office is a Named Defendant in that Lawsuit? YES
Well I Can't Talk to You.
if you Are a Plaintiff in a Lawsuit where my office is a Named Defendent, I Can't Talk To You.
I "think" we have to have Outside Counsel to Represent Us.
"the Conversation is over, I am a defendant in a Case that You brought against this Agency."
Send me the Complaint and Our Counsel Will Get Back to You
James.Rogers@ag.ny.gov - he says send the complaint and our counsel will get in touch with you.
as Soon as We legally open the lines of communication, we will get Back to You.
So what will James Rogers Senior Counsel to the New York Attorney General Really Do?
So is the Conflict of Andrew Cuomo in the iViewit Case really removed now? Did Jim Rogers, Senior Counsel to the Attorney General really admit that the NYAG is conflicted as a defendant in the iViewit lawsuit and that the NYAG cannot talk to Eliot Bernstein of iViewit. Did the NYAG office really admit that they need outside counsel.
It Seems that Jim Rogers, Senior Counsel to the Attorney General also admit conflict in representing themselves and others in the ivieiwt lawsuit.
With the removal of the NYAG as opposing counsel to 39+ new defendants in the iviewit technology lawsuit, those defendants will have to get personal and professional counsel and that would be about 80 law firms and with no conflict. This will Expose massive crime and Coverup in the iViewit Case and the case would end there as why in the world would new counsel continue to lie and cover up to protect criminals.
With the removal of the NYAG as opposing counsel to 39+ new defendants in the iviewit technology lawsuit, those defendants will have to get personal and professional counsel and that would be about 80 law firms and with no conflict. This will Expose massive crime and Coverup in the iViewit Case and the case would end there as why in the world would new counsel continue to lie and cover up to protect criminals.
Much more on this breaking story later.. as it seems there is a "good guy" at the NYAG who has
admitted NYAG conflict and sought counsel and now should do the right thing and withdraw from all cases related to the Christine Anderson, Whistleblower Case and now find non conflicted counsel to represent the NYAG...
More Coming Soon..
Jenifer deWolf Paine - Proskauer Rose LLP - Jenifer deWolf Paine
Jenifer deWolf Paine - got a Tip on Jenifer deWolf Paine? eMail your Tip on Jenifer deWolf Paine to me, Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Mark Sapperstein. Donald Stone Industries Inc. Patent Theft - Polictical Corruption, Maryland Attorney General, Joseph Curran Jr.- Glibert Sapperstein- Mark Sapperstein
Stolen Technology - Patent Theft - Political Corruption - Court Corruption - Mark Sapperstein
"Donald Stone asks this court for permission to make a brief Victim Impact Statement as part of the court record at the sentencing hearing of Gilbert Sapperstein."
"Stone has suffered irreparable damage to his patent and intellectual property as a direct result of Gilbert Sapperstein's Criminal Activity for which Gilbert Sapperstein is being Sentenced"
"... a Political Corruption Investigation..."
"Tracing Gilbert Sapperstein and his son Mark Sapperstein's Criminal Activities as far back as the 1980's early 90's..."
This Document Talks about the Connection to Maryland Attorney General Joseph Curran Jr. and the connections to Gilbert Sapperstein and Mark Sapperstein along with co-conspirator Charles R. Longo.
"In late 1991 Donald Stone formed Donald Stone Industries Inc. to commercial a technology Donald Stone had invented. By late 1993 under Stone's leadership, Stone's invention, still in it's infancy appeared to have tremendous potential in a broad spectrum of application. Donald Stone had initiated numerous discussions with major U.S. Corporations. - Mark Sapperstein
Unknown to Stone, the Donald Stone Industries Inc. Corporate Attorney Greg Burgee and his law firm Miles and Stockbridge and the secretarty / treasure of this company Bruff J. Procter wer involved in numerous fraudulant schemes such as money laundering and federal bankruptcy fraud, primarily hiding the assets of the bankruptcies of Charles R. Longo in legitimate business such as Donald Stone Industries Inc." - Mark Sapperstein
Foley and Lardner,
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Ron Nelson Construction -Montana Contractor. Nelson Construction Montana. Ron Nelson Jehovah's Witness Elder.
Coming Soon My Experience with Ron Nelson Construction - Rexford Montana.
Nelson Construction Montana. Ron Nelson Jehovah's Witness Elder Eureka Montana.
Do you have an Experience with Ron Nelson Construction - Rexford Montana.
Nelson Construction Montana to share?
Nelson Construction Montana to share?
My Experience with Ron Nelson and Insurance Scams, Construction Quality, Flat Out Lies, Over Billing, Tax Fraud, and Much More on the TRUTH of Ron Nelson Construction.
Also Coming Soon RonAndDarcy.com Facts and Documents that expose Ronald J. Nelson a Jehovah's Witness Elder since 1973, of fraud, perjury, and defamation.
More information coming soon on the strong probability that Ron Nelson has bought off attorneys, coerced insurance agents, lied about and falsified documents including appraisals, fraud against the electric company and failure to complete many contractual obligations.
The "Truth" about Jehovah's Witness Elder Ron Nelson Coming Soon.
Email Me your Tip on Ronald Nelson Montana Contractor
Ron Nelson Builder - Ron Nelson Construction
Crystal L. Cox
Real Estate Industry Whistleblower
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Friday, March 4, 2011
Special Political Favors involving Larry Strickling and in the Best Interest of Motorola.
"The improprieties stemming from the Bay Area UASI’s sponsorship of Motorola’s application for a $50M Federal BTOP grant continue to mount.
Top officials from the County of Santa Clara and City of San Jose continue to document the wrongdoing, and Federal officials at the U.S. Department of Commerce continue to make excuses to cover up what appears to a be a well-orchestrated conspiracy.
Laura Phillips continues to serve as the Bay Area UASI Executive Director, along with her team of former Motorola employees.
Lawrence Stricking, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information at the Commerce Department NTIA is responsible for the Federal oversight of the BTOP program.
Mr. Strickling is an attorney previously employed by Kirkland and Ellis, LLP, a law firm. This firm includes Motorola in its portfolio of clients.
“It is simply not acceptable to put Motorola’s interests above the mandated ARRA principles of integrity and transparency”, stated Santa Clara County Executive Jeff Smith.
Smith also points out that a $50M grant alone will not be enough to make the BayWEB project work. It will cost at least ten times this amount to complete the project.
Top officials from the County of Santa Clara and City of San Jose continue to document the wrongdoing, and Federal officials at the U.S. Department of Commerce continue to make excuses to cover up what appears to a be a well-orchestrated conspiracy.
Laura Phillips continues to serve as the Bay Area UASI Executive Director, along with her team of former Motorola employees.
Lawrence Stricking, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information at the Commerce Department NTIA is responsible for the Federal oversight of the BTOP program.
Mr. Strickling is an attorney previously employed by Kirkland and Ellis, LLP, a law firm. This firm includes Motorola in its portfolio of clients.
“It is simply not acceptable to put Motorola’s interests above the mandated ARRA principles of integrity and transparency”, stated Santa Clara County Executive Jeff Smith.
Smith also points out that a $50M grant alone will not be enough to make the BayWEB project work. It will cost at least ten times this amount to complete the project.
The project will fail for everyone except Motorola."
More Documentation at Source, Click Below
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)